|
Ed_C.
|
Hi Doper,
You determined an awful lot from the couple of words that have been written in this thread. As you say, science has linked this dis-ease to genetics, but do not really have any more answers to what is going on genetically than being able to point in the direction of there being some predisposition to those who have parents and or relatives who act in the same way.
You say that addiction is not a mental illness? Well if you did a little bit of study yourself you would find that the reason behind this affliction being called a dis-ease is the fact that we who suffer from addiction have a problem with our brains not functioning correctly. Especially when it comes to making sound decisions about doing things repetitively that cause harm to ourselves both physically and socially.
Even those who did early studies in alcoholism and drug addiction (early 1900's) knew that addiction was caused by a mental disposition. This was clearly evident in the Book of Alcoholics Anonymous when it was stated: Men and women drink essentially because they like the effect produced by alcohol. The sensation is so elusive that, while they admit it is injurious, they cannot after a time differentiate the true from the false. To them, their alcoholic life seems the only normal one. "The Dr.'s Opinion" pg. xxvi. Although this was written about alcoholism, the determination still holds true about anyone who does something addictively. I do not care if you change the word alcohol with anything done with obsession, the fact that someone acting in such a way where the outcome ends in not being able to differentiate true from false, there has to be a determination of a mental problem. This is covered even more in depth in several other studies done by renowned scientist of today (see HBO's new documentary "Addiction" @HBO.com).
One of the things I have found that accompanies this mental illness is the uncanny ability for those who suffer from it to form opinions of others based on only the knowledge they have from a couple of words written or said by someone who they have no idea about. The only reasoning behind the very short answer to the question starting this thread was to entice a more in depth reasoning behind the question.
If you would like I will share with you the "education" I have compiled over the past eight years in study of this affliction. Just remember what Hebert Spencer said "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
What say you? With complete respect, Ed C.
|